One of the ways we can analyze Mallarme is the way the
visual layout of the poem echoes his meaning of the particular words or
phrases. For example, “an utterly lost and lonely quill” is on one page off to
the corner by itself, which reiterates the meaning of something being lonely. I
personally think the only way to make since of the poem overall is to look at
the visual part of it and see how it relates to the words on the page.
Also one of the other things that Mallarme focuses on is the
use of capitalization. It basically gives an emphasis on the said/unsaid that’s
in the poem. After looking at the poem for a while, I noticed the way the words
bounced back and forth between the pages on a descent. That reminded me of a
dice throw and when you throw one it goes all over the place and bounces
around. In class we mentioned a nautical theme that was noticed in the poem,
almost as if the words were flowing between the pages and ebbing off of the
edge. At the beginning of the poem, Mallarme talks about a shipwreck in the
depths of the ocean so maybe that’s where the flow of the poem comes from.
Mallarme uses alliteration and internal rhymes in this poem.
One example of alliteration he used in the poem was “will falter/and fall/sheer
folly.” Also within this phrase the visual content was shown on the page
because as this was said the words actually looked as though they fell down the
page.
One of the themes that was also mentioned in class was how
the visual layout of the poem reflected an abyss, for example, the downward
movement of the words, the cut off of phrases from page to page, the
never-ending poem, and also the mysteriousness of the words.
One of the ways Mallarme makes analyzing the poem difficult
is his use of espacement. In class we defined espacement as the divisions
between words and the way words are set against backgrounds. The ways the words
are set give them their meaning. I still don’t quite understand why Mallarme
set his words on the pages like he did. I think this is why I had trouble even
trying to read the poem for the first time because I couldn’t even figure out
whether to read down or across the pages.
I think that Mallarme’s language is nonsense because the
only way that I made sense of this poem was from the visual layout of it. I think
that if the words and phrases were put together with out the form then they
would still make no sense. Sometimes, I think that he placed certain words or
phrases on the page based on where words needed to be plugged into the layout
or form.
I mean I guess you can say in a sense that all poetry is
nonsense in some way. Although in Lewis Carroll’s version of Alice’s Adventures
in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass, it had themes of nonsense but at
least their was a story line behind all of it. So yes I think that Mallarme’s
language can be viewed as nonsense because the only way to make sense of it is
by looking at the from and layout of the pages.
Jailyn points out the relationship with form and meaning, as many other posts also interpreted as a relationship working together to create literature that is not necessarily meaningless. Additionally, she also pointed out how grammar and style was being used as a tool of emphasis, which I agree, did a lot to give more meaning to the poem. As I was reading this section of her analysis, I started to wonder about how the rules of grammar have given very strict meaning to its’ punctuation and capitalization. Because of those strict rules, when we see them being misused intentionally, it draws the eye closer to examining the reasons for why rules are being broken in the first place. Perhaps Mallarme was trying to convey a message, which would be better received only if the rules and boundaries were reshaped and used differently in literature.
ReplyDelete