Thursday, January 30, 2014

Mallarme--Amy Bower



Mallarme’s poem “A Dice Throw” is paradoxical in that elements of sense and nonsense are at play.  On the surface, the layout of the poem appears haphazard and nonsensical. However after reading the poem, it becomes apparent that there is reason to the positioning of the words, and the words themselves are carefully chosen. For instance, at the top of page 64, Mallarme writes, “WETHER the Chasm whitish fulltide…” Between the words “the” and “Chasm,” there is a gap of white larger than that between the other words. Thus, Mallarme gives us a visual representation of the “Chasm” that he is describing. Careful choices such as this permeate throughout the poem. Much like Lewis Carroll used wordplay to force the readers to consider the many meanings and contexts of language, Mallarme uses structure as well as language to give language new meaning.
While the relationship between language and structure is thoughtfully composed, the element of the nonsensical is still very much present in the poem. For instance, there is no clear meaning to the poem. The title, “A Dice Throw,” implies that the poem is about a dice throw. The layout of the poem mimics a dice throw, in the way that the words appear to be thrown haphazardly about the page, and the downward movement of the words mirrors the action of a die falling from someone’s hand. The poem makes references to chance and rolling certain numbers, however the poem is not definitively and only about a dice throw. There is also imagery of the sea (“he used to grip the helm,” “in the name of the waves”), and the fluctuating up and down movement of the words mimics the rise and fall of waves. Furthermore, the striking amount of white space is vast and somewhat overwhelming, much like the ocean. Mallarme does not logically make sense of the relationship between these two themes, and in this way the poem is nonsensical. However, the nonsense is very much purposeful.
In some ways, the poem seems to be challenging the very idea of literature itself. Scholars are always trying to find deeper meaning in poetry and do so under the assumption that poets purposefully choose certain words to convey a specific theme. Mallarme has chosen his words carefully, but he is not trying to convey one concise theme. Instead, his words float freely across the white abyss of blank page. There is randomness to his words, but he did not choose them randomly. By manipulating form and the sounds of words, he is forcing the reader to view poetry in different ways. Someone who hears “A Dice Throw” read aloud will hear the alliteration of the lines “will falter, and fall, sheer folly,” but will not see that the words actually “fall” down the page. On the other hand, someone reading the poem in their head will see the words descending to the bottom of the page, but the alliteration will not be quite as striking.  To fully appreciate Mallarme’s writing, the reader must read it aloud with the poem in front of her. He proves that poetry is much more than carefully chosen words, but also rhythm and music and form. Mallarme’s use of “nonsense” is effective because he seems to be purposefully allowing for varied interpretations, instead of one or two set themes. Mallarme’s view seems to be that poetry is a complicated art form, and not something that can be easily dissected.

1 comment:

  1. I thought you did a really great job analyzing the poem, Amy. I really liked what you had to say about the white spaces and how they were so unexpectedly intentional. It’s important to note that while they might not immediately seem intentional to us, Mallarme clearly put a lot of thought into them based on the words, which you pointed out.
    I liked your comment relating to Carroll. Both of these authors take very expected aspects of poetry and twist them in a way that makes one think. For example, as you pointed out, Carroll uses different nursery rhymes and tunes that have meanings that most people take for granted. However, by changing the words and yet keeping the rhyme scheme and tune the same, Carroll is making the reader take a step back and reconsider the meaning of the words. I really liked that you connected that idea to the structure of the poem as laid out by Mallarme.
    It seems as though there is more of a connection between the dice throw and the ocean than one would originally think. Both are very much related to chance and can be very haphazard. It’s important to consider this idea when reading this poem because, as you mentioned, the poem might seem haphazardly organized at first glance but in reality there is a purpose to the layout of the poem. This idea, I believe, relates well to the two themes of a dice being thrown and the ocean. Both may seem haphazard and a matter of luck but in reality there are different forces at work. For example, when Mallarme wrote this poem, the ocean seemed like a game of luck. However, in current times this idea is not as true because people have become better masters at sea with better technology and knowledge. This idea is similar to a dice being thrown, which people now know can be calculated, at least to some extent.
    I really liked your final analyses of Mallarme’s poem. I had not thought about that idea before and I think it’s very strikingly true. It seems as though, from your interpretation that Mallarme is at odds with himself throughout the poem. On the one hand, he wants the theme to be the ocean, but on the other, he wants it to be the throw of a die. Similarly, he wants the reader to have to actually look at the text in order to grasp the full meaning, but he also wants the reader to have to read it out loud. The idea of nonsense here stems from these different desires and ways of interpreting the poem. With poetry in general, people always seem to believe that there are different interpretations and ways of reading them, however, it seems as though Mallarme is going a step further and showing that in reality there is no right interpretation or way to read this poem. This idea is an interesting take on the idea of nonsense. Most people believe that nonsense is synonymous with making no sense but it is interesting that instead, you are stating that it means that there is too much meaning. What makes Mallarme’s writing so interesting is that on a very basic level, one can understand what is occurring in the poem. However, the nonsense stems from when one looks deeper at the poem. From this idea, I believe Mallarme is making the point that any interpretation at all can be considered nonsensical.

    ReplyDelete